
Are Variable Annuities Good Investment or Trap: Costs, Risks, and Why Variable Annuities May Not Be Right for You.
5 min read
1
5
0

Variable annuities are often marketed as an attractive retirement investment vehicle, combining the potential for market-based growth with tax-deferred benefits. However, these financial products come with complexities and risks that can make them unsuitable for many investors, particularly retirees seeking security and predictability. The first nineteen pages of the document outline the fundamental structure of variable annuities, including their benefits, associated fees, and potential drawbacks, offering a cautionary perspective on why these instruments may not always align with an investor’s long-term financial goals.
Â
At their core, variable annuities are contracts between an investor and an insurance company, whereby the investor makes either a lump sum payment or a series of contributions. These funds are then invested in subaccounts, which function similarly to mutual funds, allowing the investor to participate in market growth. Unlike fixed annuities, where the returns are guaranteed, variable annuities expose investors to market fluctuations, meaning their value can rise and fall based on investment performance. This inherent volatility is one of the primary concerns for retirees who may not have the time horizon or risk tolerance to withstand significant downturns.
Â
Another significant issue with variable annuities is their complexity and cost. The document highlights various fees that can erode returns over time, including mortality and expense risk charges, administrative fees, investment management fees, and surrender charges. Mortality and expense risk fees compensate the insurance company for taking on risks and typically range from 1% to 1.5% annually. Â These fees can significantly reduce the overall returns.
Â
Additionally, the investment options within a variable annuity come with their own expense ratios, further increasing the cost burden. Unlike investing in a standard brokerage account, where investors have access to a broad range of funds with competitive expense ratios, the funds within variable annuities often come with significantly higher costs. These expense ratios, which cover the cost of fund management, can sometimes be double or even triple what investors would otherwise pay for similar investments in mutual funds or ETFs available outside of the annuity structure. Furthermore, the selection of investment options within a variable annuity is usually limited, meaning investors may not have access to the best-performing funds or those that align with their preferred investment strategy. As a result, the combination of high costs and restricted investment choices can substantially diminish long-term returns, making variable annuities a less efficient vehicle for retirement savings compared to other investment alternatives.
Â
Another layer of complexity comes from the riders and optional benefits that insurance companies offer with variable annuities. These may include guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefits, death benefits, or long-term care coverage. While these features can provide additional security, they often come at an added cost, sometimes increasing overall expenses by 1% to 2% annually or even more. However, these benefits are often accompanied by significant limitations that investors may not fully understand. For example, guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefits may impose restrictions on the percentage that can be withdrawn annually, with penalties for exceeding this limit.
Â
The fees that variable annuities impose, including mortality and expense risk charges, administrative fees, investment management fees tied to the underlying funds, optional riders for benefits like guaranteed lifetime withdrawals or enhanced death benefits a range of fees that can significantly erode investment returns. While exact costs vary, a rough, back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests that total fees can range from approximately 2% to 4.5% more annually than traditional retirement accounts and investments (and even more). On a $100,000 investment, this translates to an estimated annual cost of $2,000 to $4,500, directly reducing net returns. Over a 10-year period, assuming a 6% gross return, these simplified projections indicate that fees at the 4.5% level could reduce the final account value to approximately $116,000, compared to $179,000 if no fees were applied - the difference of $63,000! Though these figures are illustrative and admittedly very rough estimates, they highlight the real impact of fees on long-term performance and why variable annuities may not be the most efficient investment choice for retirement savings.
Â
In addition to ongoing fees, surrender charges present another major drawback for investors who may need liquidity. If an investor decides to withdraw funds within a certain period, typically six to ten years, they may face steep surrender charges, sometimes as high as 7% in the first year, gradually decreasing over time. This illiquidity can pose problems for retirees who need access to their funds for unexpected expenses or changes in financial circumstances. Moreover, variable annuities often carry restrictions on withdrawals before age 59½, which can trigger a 10% IRS penalty on top of ordinary income tax liabilities, further complicating their appeal as a flexible retirement tool.
Â
Additionally, certain death benefits may only apply if the annuity is held for a specific period or if withdrawals have not been taken. Age-based limitations are another concern, as some riders may become unavailable or significantly more expensive depending on when they are purchased. Some benefits also depend on specific market conditions, meaning they may not provide the protection investors assume they will. Given these complexities, investors must carefully assess whether these benefits justify the additional charges or if alternative financial products may provide similar protection at a lower cost without the same degree of restrictions.
Â
Tax treatment is an area where investors may misunderstand the true benefits of variable annuities. While these products offer tax-deferred growth, withdrawals are taxed as ordinary income rather than at the potentially lower capital gains tax rate. For high-net-worth retirees in particular, this taxation structure can lead to greater tax liabilities than alternative investment strategies, such as taxable brokerage accounts or Roth IRAs, which offer more favorable tax treatment in some cases.
Â
Finally, variable annuities are often sold aggressively by financial professionals due to their high commissions. The document highlights concerns about potential conflicts of interest, where brokers or insurance agents may prioritize selling annuities over lower-cost alternatives because of the financial incentives involved. This commission-driven sales model increases the likelihood that investors may be placed in products that do not align with their best interests, making due diligence and independent financial advice critical.
Â
In conclusion, while variable annuities may offer benefits such as tax-deferred growth and optional income guarantees, they also present significant risks and costs that can make them unsuitable for many investors, particularly retirees. High fees, surrender charges, tax inefficiencies, and the potential for conflicts of interest mean that investors should carefully evaluate whether these products align with their financial goals. For many, traditional retirement accounts and lower-cost investment options may provide a more effective and flexible strategy for securing financial stability in retirement.
Â
For investors who believe they were misled or sold an unsuitable variable annuity, legal recourse is available. AMW Law PLLC provides representation for investors who have suffered financial losses due to unsuitable annuity sales. Through the FINRA arbitration forum, investors can seek to recover damages from brokers and financial firms that failed to act in their best interests. Variable annuities should only be recommended when they truly fit an investor’s needs, and when brokers fail to properly disclose risks, fees, or conflicts of interest, legal action may be warranted. Our firm is dedicated to protecting investors and ensuring they receive the compensation they deserve.